The context in which an interaction occurs has a profound effect on communication. In face-to-face encounters, factors ranging from psychological to environmental to cultural all have an effect on how the message is transmitted and how it is understood. Online communication is no less subject to context, and may bring with it additional contextual issues that will have an effect on the intended message.

The type of technology being used to facilitate the interaction, for example, has a bearing on the environmental context of the conversation. A conversation taking place through instant messaging in between meetings will have a different flavor than if the same topic were discussed in a virtual world, on the phone, or in an online meeting room.

The challenge of any communication, that of being understood, exists online as much as—maybe more so than—offline. Posts on threaded discussion forums and instant message communications are notoriously hard to decode correctly because of the lack of nuance. As more people participate in these kinds of communications, signals that were developed to add context to text-based messages, like smileys ( :-) ) and tags (like <rant> </rant>), are slipping into the mainstream. The issue of context is far from solved, though, and continues to surface with each new mode of communication that emerges.

Posted by NMC on November 29, 2007
Tags: Section

Total comments on this page: 5

How to read/write comments

Comments on specific paragraphs:

Click the icon to the right of a paragraph

  • If there are no prior comments there, a comment entry form will appear automatically
  • If there are already comments, you will see them and the form will be at the bottom of the thread

Comments on the page as a whole:

Click the icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)

Comments

No comments yet.

Ghost of MM on whole page :

This seems to beg a reference to McLuhan’s proclamation of the medium being the message. What is the message of this new medium? it seems to be a lot of static at times….

November 29, 2007 3:16 pm
Philippe Borremans on whole page :

If you understand the medium and it’s effect on your message you can tailor the message according to the medium in order to have only a minimal effect on the intended message… Waaow… does that make sense…? ;-) Anyway, the audience is the most important part of the communications equation so….

November 30, 2007 7:42 am
Andy Powell on whole page :

Two thoughts…

Firstly, my suspicion is that the more primitive the form of (e-)communication the more inventive people become in its use – the community develops subtlety around a medium in very inventive ways. One has seen this happening over a very long period of time with text-based email – the indentation and nesting of responses in threads of debate for example. (Yes, I’m old-skool). The advent of HTML email hasn’t enhanced this… quite the opposite. I would argue that the apparent advantages of a markup language for email messages has actually resulted in the partial destruction of some of the conventions that emerged over a long period of time. Perhaps we are waiting for new conventions to emerge, or perhaps this is just another nail in the coffin of email?

SMS text messaging is a better example (SMS is much more widely used in the UK than in the US). SMS is a very primitive technology for communication, yet people have almost invented a whole new written language out of it – one that now appears outside of it’s original (cell-phone) environment.

Secondly, new conventions around e-communication continue to emerge in a natural selection kind of way all the time. I first noticed the use of the @andypowe11 convention in Twitter, indicating that a tweet is directed at, or referring to, a particular Twitter user. (The convention may well have originated elsewhere but that is where I first noticed it.) Now that same convention is starting to appear elsewhere – in Second Life chat-logs for example, in threaded email conversations, etc.

December 1, 2007 12:53 am
Joan Vinall-Cox on whole page :

What about the differences in synchronous and asynchronous communication? Panning for asynchronous communication in any media takes much more planning, because you have to figure out what your audience needs/wants to know ahead of time. Even a formal, planned presentation in a F2F environment has feedback available to the presenters that allows them to alter and update their message while giving it.

December 1, 2007 6:29 am
Kieran Kiernan/Cannistra on whole page :

More than the lack of nuance is the troublesome nature of lasting communication that doesn’t update as intention/meaning evolves. By this I mean: I have many opinions, but not terribly many convictions. When I post to a forum, there’s a very good chance I won’t feel quite the same way in 10 minutes or that someone will post something that alters my position.

Anyone who has been misquoted in print and never recovered should understand what I’m getting at.

December 4, 2007 2:04 pm
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI